Advertisement
There is a "special" on at 8, then the two-part season finale starting at 9 (8 central).
Then nothing but despair and doubt and the wailing and gnashing of teeth until next January (possibly February).
Enjoy!
Then nothing but despair and doubt and the wailing and gnashing of teeth until next January (possibly February).
Enjoy!
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Unsu...
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 7:21 AMWith so many references to C.S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia, Dante's Inferno, Ovid's Metamorphosis and bits and pieces of various books from the old Testament, I can't help but wonder if Jacob is supposed to be set up as (the now martyred) messiah. And if so, is Ben his Judah? Have they killed their 'one true god'?
Where does that leave the paganism vs. monotheism issue they've been toying with throughout this show? And now that Jack is apparently a man of faith rather than science, where does that leave the science vs. faith issue?
-K
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 7:56 AMWell, apparently Locke is really dead since his body rolled out of the crate Iliana's group was carrying...so who was walking around with Ben and the group that landed on the Island all this time? Looks like "Locke" was really the guy at the beginning of the episode talking to Jacob about wanting to killl him....seems rather biblical, if you ask me...Jacob and Esau's story ring some bells. So, was Jacob indeed killed? Was he ever truly a real "person"? Does anyone think "Smokey" played a part in this...namely the Locke Impersonator being Smokey in disguise perhaps??
Is it curtains for Sayid? Will the detonation of the bomb reallly erase the events and bring everyone back to where they were supposed to be before the crash?
Too many questions (as usual)...and another 8-9 months to wait for the final season and the final answers. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 8:09 AMJacob has a connection with everyone but Ben.
He connected with at least 3 characters while they were children (great casting on young Kate)
A loophole had to be found to kill Jacob. So why was Ben there?
Maybe he never had a purpose other than to kill Jacob?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob's_Ladder -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:39 PM>>(great casting on young Kate)<<
Agreed!
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 8:28 AM*sigh*
How, if they never make it to the island, can they detonate a bomb that would prevent them from coming to the island? It's like the theory that, if you go through a wormhole, you eternally keep going through it, seeing yourself going through it, an endless loop.
I guess "Locke" in this episode was that guy in the beginning with Jacob who told him he wanted to kill him as they watched the Black Rock ship sail in. I really believe that this whole story plays out over and over until they get it "right" (which seems relative at this point). Maybe "right" is not continually looping through time....I dunno. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 8:45 AMHard to say when in time that opening scene took place?
It was a tall ship I would think from the 1800's?
But not sure if that's when the scene was supposed to be taking place.
YES that person with Jacob was in some way connected in spirit to the modern day Locke.
Jacob knew what was coming as he had to visit characters during certain key points in their life.
I don't think for a moment we have heard the last of Jacob. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:37 AMyeah i don't think so either, that would be too simple.
Rose and Bernard and their little retirement cabin by the sea! Loved it! -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:52 AMIs it possible that Locke/Aaron/the guy in the beginning is one and the same? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:53 AMi don't think so
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:00 AMIn the first scene, the guy with Jacob said that he would find a loophole to kill him. Of course it's the same guy, they talked about loopholes when Jacob was stabbed. I don't know about Aaron, though...why Aaron? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:44 PMDo you really think it was the Black Rock on the horizon? The wreck is located in the middle of the island, far from shore. I always imagined that during one of its 'moves' the island materialized beneath the ship. If the ship on the horizon in the opening scene is the Black Rock how did it get so far inland? (silly me I also imagined it to have black sails, like the Black Pearl)
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:55 AMI was thinking this morning... do you suppose the "Adam" and "Eve" skeletons might be Rose & Bernard? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:57 AMOh, and does anyone have a translation yet on that Latin answer (to "What lies in the shadow of the statue")? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:05 AM>Oh, and does anyone have a translation yet on that Latin answer (to "What lies in the shadow of the statue")?<
He who will protect us all. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:09 AM"He who will protect us all."
Thanks!! :) -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:12 AMSobek is the Egyptian crocodile god. He was considered the god of crocodiles and dark water. Some sects worshiped him as the Creator. He helped Horus in his battle with Set, and was hailed as a protector. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:15 AMOh, and Sobek was also supposedly a restorer of order after chaos. I find that significant.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobek
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:20 AMYes, that statue is totally Sobek and the Wiki page has what I thought to be a very interesting detail about Sobek:
"Sobek's ambiguous nature led some Egyptians to believe that he was a repairer of evil that had been done, rather than a force for good in itself, for example, going to Duat to restore damage done to the dead as a result of their form of death. He was also said to call on suitable gods and goddesses required for protecting people in situation, effectively having a more distant role, nudging things along, rather than taking an active part. In this way, he was seen as a more primal god, eventually becoming regarded as an avatar of the primal god Amun, who at that time was considered the chief god. When his identity finally merged, Amun had become merged himself with Ra to become Amun-Ra, so Sobek, as an avatar of Amun-Ra, was known as Sobek-Ra."
Jacob seemed to be taking the distant role and subtly nudging people and things along during the whole episode.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobek -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:57 AMMy husband and I were laughing at the final scene. So the bomb falls all the way down there and does not detonate on impact but Juliet hitting it with a rock does it just fine? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 6:19 PM>>My husband and I were laughing at the final scene. So the bomb falls all the way down there and does not detonate on impact but Juliet hitting it with a rock does it just fine?<<
Maybe... or maybe the big flash of light was "The Incident" and not the bomb. Or maybe it was another time shift (someone like Richard turning the Donkey wheel at the same instant) and next season all of our original losties will be back together and the useless bomb core will still un-detonated somewhere on the island.
I was really hoping to see Claire this episode!
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 1:56 PMThe statue is totally not Sobek. First, the legs are together indicating female deity. Second, crocodiles don't have ears. Third, the hair and headdress are wrong. The statue is Tawaret the protector of pregnant women. Taweret had the head of a hippopotamus and the lower jaw of a crocodile. Hippos have four toes, btw. Additional confirmation will be if we discover that the incident is what destroyed the statue. Before the incident, women on the island did not die during pregnancy. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 2:01 PMI actually suspect that the statue may be an amalgam of a few gods hence the ears but we definitely saw a crocodile face on both the statue and the woven cloth from the cabin. Also the clothing (the short skirt) is more indicative of a male Egyptian than a female. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 2:11 PMMy roommate's prediction: Faraday was wrong, you can't change the past, and so Season 6 will simply be a re-airing of Season 1.
Obviously not going to happen, but wouldn't that be funny? The writers' giant "PSYCH!" to its entire fan base. :)
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:23 PMBy the way was that a red herring that Jacob was having for breakfast in the beginning? If it was then that is pretty funny. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:32 PM*laughing*
That would be funny. But apparently, a red herring is just a kipper (I learned something new today):
images.google.com/images
They don't look anything like what he cooked up last night. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:35 PMHmmm, I tried to upload a screencap of the stature, but nothing has happened yet. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:42 PMLostpedia always has screencaps lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Fou...ed_statue -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 9:01 AMIn some statues of Sobek the god actually does have ears despite being a crocodile god.
www.biasci.com/polyorg/Sobek_idol.jpg
www.rainbowcrystal.com/egypt/...bek.jpg
www.crystalinks.com/sobek.png
Also it is interesting that the god Anubis protected the dead from Ammut who was the devourer of the dead. Ammut had a crocodile head and a lion body and hippo feet (four toes).
www.egyptartsite.com/myth/scales2.JPG
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammut
-
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:42 PMi think he was eating a hawaiian red snapper -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:44 PMAww too bad. The red herring joke would have been amusing. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:06 PMDid anyone else feel like (for a split second) you were watching The A Team when the van pulled up and everyone jumped out shooting? Only difference is these bullets actually hit people! -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:14 PM"I love it when a plan comes together !"
ah, Hurley and his magic bus.... -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:18 PMSawyer is the faceman.
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:24 PMBlue bus. Magic bus. If Roger Daltry makes a guest appearance next season I'm gonna freak out I tell you! lol
Tom Sawyer he gets high on you.........www.youtube.com/watch
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:53 PMThe picture on the cloth in the cabin is much more like Sobek than the statue. The figure is striding and there don't seem to be ears. The cloth is held so the headdress is not visible. Tawaret is also normally depicted as pregnant. But an ankh in each hand is more in line with Tawaret than Sobek. But considering how fast and loose they played with the bomb, they're probably just as loose with Egyptian mythology. Jacob's Aten tapestry is probably some sort of clue as well. I've seen the greek phrase at the top translated as something like 'may you get everything your heart desires' and may be a quote from Homer. Did Odysseus visit the island during his wanderings after the Trojan war? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:59 PMBut does it have anything to do with the old lady who lived in a shoe? Crust of the bisquit?
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 2:37 AMI never had a long look at the statue, but I think it was Anubis, the God of the Afterlife. He has the head of a jackel and carries an ankh in his hand just like the statue. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 2:56 AMActually, I got a better look at it and it does look much like Sobek the crocodile god. I don't make much of the 4 toes. One could have broken off. In the shot of the full statue you can't tell how many toes it has. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 3:44 AMI guess we know how half the statue got blown apart.
It will be interesting to see where and where in time everyone left lands. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 5:22 AMAside Jacob, Richard seems to be the only other one who never ages througout time.
If Jacob is gone, does this mean Richard takes his spot?
It was said Richard is some type of adviser, but what does that mean.?
At times he seems to be as surprised about events as anyone else.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:10 AMY'all are going to laugh, but I dreamed last night that I met Jacob, and I asked him, "Are you God?" He replied, "Not really... it's complicated." Then there was some sort of messiah/son of God talk, and I called out to my friend nearby, "Oh, dammit, it's about the Christian myth."
I'm not saying that's what it's about or has any bearing on the actual show whatsoever. It's just what my subconscious decided to do with the information while I was asleep. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:14 AMI think Jacob could be a god like being but he does eat so he needs nutrition.
BUT maybe Jacob appears to everyone as they see him, but only as they see him and need him?
Ben has never needed Jacob. Jacob has never needed Ben, -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 8:56 AMActually, Jacob physically touched all of the Oceanic Six when he visited them. Since Esau is now inhabiting the form of John Locke, Jacob may need to inhabit Ben, in order to keep up the Battle of the Eternal Beings. Jacob did seem to egg Ben on and did not resist at all to being stabbed. Plus, he grabbed onto Ben as he was dying.
Perhaps next season, John will be the bad guy, and Ben will be the good one! -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 9:02 AM<<Actually, Jacob physically touched all of the Oceanic Six when he visited them.>>
Yes, perhaps the giving of things was only about achieving direct contact. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 9:04 AMRichard is the only other being there with a lifespan like Jacob's.
This has to come into play next season. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 9:50 AMI'm guessing that Richard, while long-lived, probably doesn't have the life/existence span of Jacob or the other guy. Richard said that Jacob made him the way he is, so Richard is a lesser being, perhaps even fully human and mortal at one time in the distant past. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 11:46 AMOkay, so I've been thinking... here's a chunk of the dialog between Jacob and the other guy (for lack of a better name, and since others in here are already doing it, let's call him Esau):
Esau: You're still trying to prove me wrong, aren't you?
Jacob: You are wrong.
Esau: Am I? They come, fight, they destroy, they corrupt. It always ends the same.
Jacob: It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress.
What if it's a discussion of Samsara? The cycle of Samsara ends with enlightenment. Assuming that enlightenment is eventually achieved, anything that happens before enlightenment is progress on the path to enlightenment.
Maybe Jacob is some kind of god-like bodhisattva (not sure what that would make Esau). Perhaps the debate between Jacob and Esau is whether or not human beings (perhaps as a species) are capable of breaking out of their cycle of Samsara, their innate tendencies towards violence and destruction and corruption, through their own free will; that we can eventually transcend our lower selves through conscious compassion and achieve enlightenment, thereby ending the cycle of Samsara, and perhaps ending the cycle of time, or even transcending time.
Thoughts? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 11:53 AMI would think there is a lot that can be said about Jacob is kind of god like in some way.
Esau had access to Jacob and they eluded to other conversations they have had together.
Richard does not seem to approach Jacob
Ben has never met Jacob
So if it only ends once does this mean it only ends for Jacob once?
Season 6 will tell us!!
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Sat, May 16, 2009 - 2:36 AM
>...the dialog between Jacob and the other guy...<
If LOST has a Rosetta Stone, then the conversation between Jacob and his dark counterpart will have to eventually prove to be the bridge language between the numinous and the mundane. My thoughts have been very similar to Enrika's; I think Enrika is either on target or very close to the mark with her well-phrased observations. My schedule has been hellish busy for days such that I have not had enough time to weigh in with a cogent comment, but I have been pondering the season finale as time and energy allow. This conversation between the light and dark beings (dressed one in white and one in black just as Cuse and Llindelof were dressed one in white and one in black in the hour of commentary preceding the finale) is key, I feel sure. There is a very dream-like quality to that interlude in particular, as with much else in the finale, but especially so with the conversation between the light and dark pair on the shore. Look at everything in the episode as dream language, the symbology of the subconscious or race mind or whatever one wants to call it, and the dialogue reads in a more epic manner. Where are they, what is between them, what is on the horizon, and so on- all very primordial and powerful dream symbols. As of course is Jacob weaving on the loom, which ties in with Grandmother Spider and the patterns she weaves with her web, the preserving power of suspended animation (a condition between life and death where the organism seems not to age, or to be ageless) with mummification confers upon those whom she encases in her silk strands, and so on -fitting hand-in-glove as well with the Medusa spider of the LOST island.
A quick note on the shaft and bomb core: again, look at everything which happened as dream symbols and it rads a bit differently than a prosaic story. Power-hungry ambitious men seeking fame and glory (Radzinsky epitomizes the ruthless technological will to power) drilling into the Earth to take her secrets and control them for their own, the overpowering force of attraction drawing dense massive objects downward into the shaft, into the yin dark, toward itself when the balance is disturbed, the blast of mind-searing white yang energy when the cylinder of the core is stroked to a high enough state of excitement with a rock (by the beautiful Juliette) that it erupts and releases the Apollonian fire. [We keep seeing Apollo _bars_ in LOST, right? Chew on that visual pun]. I thought "WTF?" when the drill was shown centered in this vast empty shaft, like a well, since in real-world drilling the shaft is exactly as wide as the drill bit and no wider by reason of both the physics of drilling and the economics of such an operation: there is no huge gaping hole around the drill and pipe which follow it in, just a bunch of fluid pumping at the interface and solid earth around that. By contrast, LOST's drilling operation was out of all proportion to reality, but then the reason for this became apparent when not only all sorts 'o metal stuff and the bomb core but the sacrificial Juliette herself went plunging down inside there. OK, fine, so we overlook the totally unrealistic drilling operation for the sake of the story and wonder "did the core explode or not?" My guess is "yes." Fits with the cover of the LIFE magazine and a bunch of other bread crumbs trailing through LOST's jungle, but it also feels like a good fit for that which must be coming in the final season.
This must have very much to do with awakening from the dream they think they are living. Awakening into a state of understanding and consciousness where they have an enlightened view of the dream they have confused for reality. Uniting or at least finding a healthy natural balance between the yin and yang aspects, the dark and light portions of the whole, is intrinsic to this process, which is akin to a loop or the endless turning of a wheel until something miraculous happens and that third eye finally opens.
Apart from the Promethean nature of LOST as a whole the literary influences which --in my experience-- most have a shared flavor with this specific LOST season finale are Moby Dick, Dark Crystal, Elfquest, and...and... ...hmmm, there is another one which I sense is right there but seems to vanish when I look directly at it. Maybe it will come into clearer view later when I do not try to see it.
Hey, speaking of sleepwalking, I am about to topple off my chair, asleep, myself; this brief note (brief, relative to the bazillion details I've been intending to comment on, though I see others have at this point already said much of it), this brief note will have to do for the moment. When my work schedule calms down in a few days I hope to be able to watch the "special" (which was interesting) feature and the remarkable finale again more closely. LOST is jumping to a higher level with this subtle yet significant contextual shift, I think, and while still operating as per usual on the mundane drama plane of he-said-she-said hormones & ego is also now managing to successfully evoke a sense of the numinous and (largely via the primal symbology of dream language) construct an epic mythos. LOST is very well done indeed.
By the way (I just cannot resist! Sorry, bundt), to attempt to quote the late great Roger Zelazny from Creatures of Light and Darkness [THATS it! This is the literary influence which was eluding me but seems to veritably hover over LOST's season finale: Creatures of Light and Darkness] with reference to Jacob we must wonder "Who is he, really, I wonder? Such heroes do not step forth fully formed from the void." Jacob has such pleasant blue eyes ...and who else in LOST has pleasant blue eyes? Perhaps in the final season we will see what happens when 'lil Aaron grows up, after all "...such heroes do not step forth fully formed from the void."
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Sat, May 16, 2009 - 9:20 AMWow.
Awesome. :)
-
Unsu...
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Tue, May 19, 2009 - 9:00 AM"...hmmm, there is another one which I sense is right there but seems to vanish when I look directly at it. Maybe it will come into clearer view later when I do not try to see it."
AlaskaSteven, I noticed some similarities between various characters and stories in Ovid's Metamorphosis and Lost. Could this perhaps be the vanishing influence you can't quite see? I'll have to think back on all of them but the one that stands out clearly for me at the moment- because it just occurred in the last episode- is Sawyer's peering into the dark abyss for his love, Juliet, which in some ways could be likened to Narcissus peering into his own reflection. I've always thought of Sawyer as a true narcissist and that his love for Juliet was perhaps the most sincere form of love he's ever encountered. Her death may very well have killed his ability to feel much of anything for anyone else with compassion (and not just opportunism).
I also see some vague similarities between Jack and Apollo. And then there’s Hurley, who’s real name is Hugo and Victor Hugo was the first to attempt to marry classical Greek literature with the modern world…which seems rather fitting as Hugo’s character is the one who seems able to walk between the many worlds of Lost (the dead, undead and living).
I’m gonna have to sit back and ponder this a bit more, but I feel certain that there are many more similarities than just these relatively obvious one’s.
-K -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Tue, May 19, 2009 - 12:12 PM
>...I noticed some similarities between various characters and stories in Ovid's Metamorphosis and Lost. Could this perhaps be the vanishing influence...<
Now, there's synchronicity! I've never read Ovid's Metamorphosis (though it is on my reading list, now!) but for several days I have been trying --unsuccessfully-- to remember the name of a comic book series I read in the late 1970's or very early 1980's with a name which started with an "M" and of which I keep seeing distinct echoes in LOST. The name of those comics (I think there were only eight, maybe ten, issues in the series) is now conjured forth from mists: "Metamorphosis." They must have been based on Ovid. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Wed, May 20, 2009 - 8:48 PMHahahaha! I was just rewatching season 3 and noticed that the name of the Dharma candy bars is APOLLO!!!! So, I would say we're on the right track (or, one of them anyway) with Ovid's stories of ancient Greece and her gods.
-K -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 21, 2009 - 1:12 PMWas the candy bar that Jacob handed Jack also an Apollo bar? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 21, 2009 - 1:53 PMYes. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 21, 2009 - 4:50 PMIt seems that Jack IS Apollo; "Medicine and healing were associated with Apollo, whether through the god himself or mediated through his son Asclepius. Apollo was also seen as a god who could bring ill-health and deadly plague as well as one who had the ability to cure. Amongst the god's custodial charges, Apollo became associated with dominion over colonists..." (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo)
-K
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 21, 2009 - 5:00 PMOr, perhaps his father is the more fitting Apollo, but Jack certainly fits the bill for seasons 1 through 3. He is also said to have given oracle guidance to colonies. Jack being Apollo also fits with Kate being Daphne. "Daphne was an independent-minded, love- and marriage-hating young huntress, a follower of Artemis (Diana). Her father, the river god Peneus, wished her to marry and have children, but all Daphne that wanted was to hunt alone in the deep woods, rejoicing in her freedom."
In Ovid, the story progresses with Apollo hunting the huntress Daphne, finally overtaking her but before he actually caught her she made a plea to the gods to change her into a form that Apollo couldn't hunt. She was turned into a laurel tree. (Guess she should have been more specific in her request.) Despite this metamorphosis into a tree, Apollo still basically molested her and then cut off some of her branches for a wreath that he wore and displayed to show his ownership of her.
Is it just me or does anyone else here see some serious similarities between jack as Apollo and Kate as Daphne?
-K
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 6:55 AMK, i really suspected you of snark at first, with the ovid references, but i think you may be on to something :o)
whether or not there's an *actual* influence on the writers is irrelevant. if someone can see it, it's there. (1st rule of literary analysis)
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 9:51 AM
>Or, perhaps his father is the more fitting Apollo, but Jack certainly fits the bill for seasons 1 through 3...Is it just me or does anyone else here see some serious similarities between jack as Apollo<
Yes, the flavor is strongly present, though Jack may transpose best across the mythos as Asclepius, Apollo's son.
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 11:13 AM> Or, perhaps his father is the more fitting Apollo, but Jack certainly fits the bill for seasons 1 through 3.
I would think Christian Shepard is more of a Bacchus. Although his name would imply an entirely different mythology. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 1:48 PMI feel like the myth of Orpheus going into the underworld to fits into here somewhere. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 5:04 PM
>I feel like the myth of Orpheus going into the underworld to fits into here somewhere.<
Well, the myth which jumped to my mind when I saw Juliette tumble into the dark is that of Persephone (or Proserpine, if like Roman-style better than doing it Greek). Swinburne's "The Garden of Proserpine" is one of my favorite poems of all time (though the version found in many books and online is missing an entire stanza, which really matters to the meaning of the work -accept no substitutes for the real thing! Here is a link to the poem in its entirety as written by Swinburne: www.bartleby.com/42/737.html ). Once upon a time as a lad I memorized this immortal poem and could declaim it quite passionately, so a chord was struck when I saw Juliette enter the underworld. That she must unwillingly follow Pluto to his realm and there--as his reluctant bride--arouses him (angrily stroking the plutonium-filled shaft to the point of explosion) rather fits, too.
Persephone's myth is connected with that of Orpheus, according to Wiki, so maybe there is a LOST fit.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proserpina
Juliette, more than any other figure in LOST, is directly concerned with cultivating fertility in a rather Persephone-like way. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 5:10 PMWell yes, it was Persephone who convinced her husband to let Eurydice go when Orpheus went to get her from the underworld. Of course Orpheus messed the whole deal up because of his lack of faith. He doubted whether Eurydice was actually behind him and he looked back even though he had agreed that he would not look back until they were out of the underworld. Hmmm.
Good call on connecting Juliet to Persephone but I also wonder if it is not Claire who could be most likened to Persephone. She is away (who knows where) and her mother longs for her. Perhaps there will be a spring of sorts when she returns. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 22, 2009 - 10:49 PM
>the myth which jumped to my mind when I saw Juliette tumble into the dark<
I've not yet found three spare hours to settle in and rewatch the season finale ion VHS, but if memory serves then a more accurate way to describe what happened than "Juliette tumble[d] into the dark" would be "when Juliette was compelled into the dark, ultimately surrendering herself to this doom in self-sacrifice so as to save others by removing a reason for them to remain at risk in conflict with a more powerful and inexorable force." Wordy, but more accurate, and much more like Persephone, too.
I cannot quite remember- was Juliette entangled in chains and being thusly compelled? If so, then the Persephone analogy is particularly apt as she was bound to that fate, compelled to Pluto's dark underworld as if wrapped in chains.
>Good call on connecting Juliet to Persephone<
Thanks! ; )
>but I also wonder if it is not Claire who could be most likened to Persephone. She is away (who knows where) and her mother longs for her. Perhaps there will be a spring of sorts... <
If some of the characters are refractions of a larger splintered composite whole, Dark Crystal-like, then perhaps Juliette and Claire are both parts of the same fractured being, but that seems like an awfully big reach. In Zelazny-like fashion I suspect there may be a somewhat simpler explanation than invoking splintered entities, but all the twinning and similarities between various small groupings of characters keep me wondering about a possible Dark Crystal vein running though LOST.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 10:00 AMi think it could be, since they knew about the cave and were there in the 1970's with the rest of them. unlikely they lived until 2004. i guess it depends on what setting off the bomb did!
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 9:59 AMA couple of things:
In the beginning - one guy wore a black shirt, the other a white shirt. When have we seen this motif before? Could it be foreshadowing? Could it be a red-herring in a Salmon Rushdie sort of way. Meaning sometimes angels can be evil and demons can be good. Or something like that.
this point was smacked home when at the end the LOST logo went black on white background vs the way we have seen it for years now (white on black background).
_______________
How about the candy bar Jack was trying to retrieve from the vending machine. Where else have you seen that candy bar. I saw it on a rack in a store that was being destroyed in the film Cloverfield and I saw it . . . _______________.
_______________
I have more but I can't remember right now. I have a great memory - it's just short.
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 14, 2009 - 3:38 PM>>>How about the candy bar Jack was trying to retrieve<<<
Kate (or Hurley?) found abox of them his first day in the hatch pantry. Annie gave one to Ben the day he arrived on the island. I had thought they were a Dharma thing so I was surprised to see them in the real world vending machine.
So the guy in dark (name?) can't kill Jacob, the guy in light.. and Ben and Charles can't kill each other. Hmmmm. Will Ben find a loophole now? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 1:22 AMIt seemed to me that each time Jacob visited someone prior to their time on the island, he gave them something. There was something signifigant about the giving.
I'm instantly charmed and convinced that the Adam and Eve skeletons are Rose and Bernard.
I also feel like it's beginning to show that it's about the Christian myth. It could still easily go elsewhere of course. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 8:03 AM<<It seemed to me that each time Jacob visited someone prior to their time on the island, he gave them something.>>
I noticed he gave them stuff as well.
Kate he gave her the lunch box.
Sawyer he gave a pen.
Jack he gave a candy bar.
What did he give Sayid, Locke and Sun and Jin?
With Locke I am guessing he gave him hope? Or did he actually revive him when he touched him so he gave him life?
He maybe saved Sayid's life.
He gave Sun and Jin his blessings. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 8:15 AM<<He gave Sun and Jin his blessings>>
And spoke Korean well
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 6:59 PMKate received the lunch box
Sawyer received the pen
Jack received the candy bar
Locke received life (and apologies- "I'm sorry this happened to you.")
Sun and Jin received his blessing
Sayid took a piece of paper from him as Jacob asked directions ** Sayid is the only one who is shown receiving a visit POST- ISLAND.**
The camera clearly paused at several of the exchanges, lending them signifigance. I noticed the touch as well, but thought the giving was a more perplexing mystery. The question is, what it is they are receiving? -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 7:02 PMAhh, he did indeed give Sayid a paper.
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Mon, May 18, 2009 - 2:30 PM> Kate received the lunch box
> Sawyer received the pen
> Jack received the candy bar
> Locke received life (and apologies- "I'm sorry this happened to you.")
> Sun and Jin received his blessing
> Sayid took a piece of paper from him as Jacob asked directions ** Sayid is the only one who is shown receiving a visit POST- ISLAND.**
Hurley received a visit post-island. And he received the guitar case, and flight information. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Mon, May 18, 2009 - 2:33 PMHow the heck did we leave out Hurley?!! :(
He was the only one who got direct information. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Mon, May 18, 2009 - 6:49 PMI can't believe we all collectively forgot Hurley. He got the most direct contact, the most involved and frank contact at least. Which is fitting, because more and more I think Hurley is the only one with any sense at all.
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Thu, May 21, 2009 - 8:23 AMDid anyone else think Hurley and Jacob in the taxi was somewhat reminiscent of Desmond and Charles Widmore in the back of the limo? They had both just exited jail and were approached with "gifts" but one approach was welcoming and the other was threatening.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 8:31 AM<<Rose and Bernard and their little retirement cabin by the sea! Loved it!>>
It cracked me up that their attitude was just like, yeah whatever go shoot each other some more and leave us alone. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 8:33 AMThose two had an easy season
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 8:33 AMDid anyone else feel like Jack is pretty much exactly the same guy he always was? So what he has a new theory about what is going on but he seems to not have grown and have made no personal transformation at all. He still thinks he is right and listens to no one else. Same thing as always. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Fri, May 15, 2009 - 9:44 PMYou know, Richard sort of strikes me as a Merlin type character. That level of respected advisor.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Sat, May 16, 2009 - 11:55 AMI haven't read this whole thread yet so forgive me if someone said this already but if it's possible for there to be a baby Miles and an adult Miles in the same time, why isn't it possible for the dead Locke to be a future Locke that's been brought back. Or that the Locke in Jacob's room is a past Locke.
Streder -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Sat, May 16, 2009 - 5:30 PMStreder my husband said something similar. I'm still thinking about it. It seems we know that the live Locke isn't really Locke at all but there is no guarantee that the dead Locke is Locke either. Or maybe not the Locke of this timeline. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Sat, May 16, 2009 - 5:58 PMSO maybe it's more than just time?
What about dimensions?
People could even be in the same time but a different dimension. -
-
Re: Discussion: Season 5, Episode 16/17, "The Incident Parts 1 & 2"
Sun, May 17, 2009 - 9:53 AMEnrika, you're referring to Samsara, the concept of reincarnation in Hinduism and Buddhism (just to clarify). It's an interesting theory. Since we've seen many themes dealing with judgement, rebirth, and redemption on Lost, it seems like the purpose of the survivors' crashing on the island was so that they would be forced to confront their past actions and ultimately be given the choice to redeem themselves. One of the maddening details of Jack's plan to blow up the Swan and erase everything that's happened to the Losties is that it was no coincidence that the electromagnetic energy was not vented by Desmond in the Swan at that very moment, hence bringing down the plane. The survivors were all meant to be on that island. It's obvious that the Dharma Initiative (dharma: righteous duty or virtuous path) is about more than the study of parapsychology, zoology, electromagnetism, etc. The island, with the help of Smokey, judges those for what they have done or what has been done to them and forces them to confront it. Those who are brought to the island are at the mercy of the island, and not in charge of their own fate until the island has decided to release them.
Maybe Jacob's statement about those who come there going through the same cycles and things always ending in the same way refers to reality on the island itself. A mini Samsara if you will. Those who come there struggle, love, battle with eachother and ultimately take destiny into their own hands, resulting in ...?
Maybe those who are left standing at the end will be redeemed and will be able to leave for good and lead happy lives in the real world. I keep hoping that if we do see the plane land in LA safe and sound (although I still really hate this idea) everyone will be different. They worked out their shit on the island and have completely different realities and completely different lives to come back to.
... Just some random thoughts spurred on by your idea about Samsara...
-
-
-
-
-