The whole notion of sacrifice seems very prominent and significant in LOST.
Especially intriguing to me is the repeated assertion that "the island demands" the sacrifice of human lives -as with Boone, Locke's father (initially when he was lashed to a stone pillar and then for reals later inside the Black Rock), Charlie's sacrifice in the Hydra, and so on. Why would the island demand human lives be sacrificed? That is, to put the question in a way which is perhaps more operationally useful, how would it be that whatever mechanism we are calling "the island" would actually need--as in require--lives to be sacrificed in order for it to function and/or for its goals to be realized?
Here is everything I found on sacrifice over at Lostpedia-
www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Sacrifice
Seems to me an explanation with regard to "the island's" need for human lives to be LOST could be either:
1) certain people must perish in specific ways at specific moments in order for other individuals to advance onward to reach essential realizations, balancings of dharma, and physical juxtapositionings ...this so later on when those still-living key persons, in turn, need to exercise free will in order to act in just a certain way they will indeed be in the right places at the right times and have the specific perspective and will needed to do so,
and/or
2) the "island" (and I do not buy for an instant that what is meant by "the island" is really just a lump of unintelligent rock and coconut trees) needs human sacrifices to operate much like an automobile needs gasoline and oil to be able to drive down the road. Somehow, the life force of humans (or, at least, of specific humans) is fuel for the mechanism, the energy source powering its continued operation. If the "island" is indeed an obligate humanivore then it absolutely must continue to eat people or else it starves to death and dies.
It is interesting that while ---for whatever mysterious reason(s)-- the island demands human lives be LOST, no new human lives can be gained on the island. Is this radical imbalance another of those dynamic dark-and-light twinned opposite pairings? Women --the goddess principle, vessels of life-- cannot give birth to new life if they conceive on the island, while at the same time "the island demands" life be sacrificed. Hmmm.
Moreover, if we reflect for a moment, it occurs to mind that while Ana Lucia and Libby and the two hot Other chicks hidden together down in the Hydra (being all lonely and having needs in their wet tank tops) --as well as many other women-- did indeed all die, perhaps their deaths were more connected to their dharma becoming completely balanced and not in the nature of being sacrifices demanded by the island. Their dharma complete, and thus those women's lives here in this world complete, at that exact instant it is therefore immediately "time to go! NOW!" Those women died on the spot, yes, but maybe by a different pathway or phenomenon being at work than that of the island demanding human sacrifices. Same deal for the red shirt males (like Oceanic 815's pilot). By contrast, though, the three definite high-profile human sacrifices explicitly named as being just exactly that --human sacrifices demanded by the island-- have all been pivotally important males: the beautiful Boone (a martyred innocent Christ figure if ever there was one; "Boone" literally means "a beneficial gift or kind assistance freely given"), Locke's father, and Charlie. Maybe something in the broken symmetry of the electromagnetic anomaly event is skewing the metaphysical dharmaworks-wave-particles on the male/female axis such that the discontinuity is literally a matter of life and death for the men and women involved? This notion, in turn, suggests noble servant Ben acting desperately as midwife to the birth of life, healer of the timespace wound, and holder of the bridge between worlds instead of just being a malicious, ratty, and ubersmart little bastard.
What are the other explanations I am overlooking &/or logical contradictions I have naively wandered into? Implications flowing from the articulations of sacrifice in LOST? Why is sacrifice such a big element in so many of the character's development and how have those sacrifices manifested to date? Perhaps most interestingly, what are the sacrifices yet to come and who will be making them, to what effect?
Comments? Guesses?
Especially intriguing to me is the repeated assertion that "the island demands" the sacrifice of human lives -as with Boone, Locke's father (initially when he was lashed to a stone pillar and then for reals later inside the Black Rock), Charlie's sacrifice in the Hydra, and so on. Why would the island demand human lives be sacrificed? That is, to put the question in a way which is perhaps more operationally useful, how would it be that whatever mechanism we are calling "the island" would actually need--as in require--lives to be sacrificed in order for it to function and/or for its goals to be realized?
Here is everything I found on sacrifice over at Lostpedia-
www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Sacrifice
Seems to me an explanation with regard to "the island's" need for human lives to be LOST could be either:
1) certain people must perish in specific ways at specific moments in order for other individuals to advance onward to reach essential realizations, balancings of dharma, and physical juxtapositionings ...this so later on when those still-living key persons, in turn, need to exercise free will in order to act in just a certain way they will indeed be in the right places at the right times and have the specific perspective and will needed to do so,
and/or
2) the "island" (and I do not buy for an instant that what is meant by "the island" is really just a lump of unintelligent rock and coconut trees) needs human sacrifices to operate much like an automobile needs gasoline and oil to be able to drive down the road. Somehow, the life force of humans (or, at least, of specific humans) is fuel for the mechanism, the energy source powering its continued operation. If the "island" is indeed an obligate humanivore then it absolutely must continue to eat people or else it starves to death and dies.
It is interesting that while ---for whatever mysterious reason(s)-- the island demands human lives be LOST, no new human lives can be gained on the island. Is this radical imbalance another of those dynamic dark-and-light twinned opposite pairings? Women --the goddess principle, vessels of life-- cannot give birth to new life if they conceive on the island, while at the same time "the island demands" life be sacrificed. Hmmm.
Moreover, if we reflect for a moment, it occurs to mind that while Ana Lucia and Libby and the two hot Other chicks hidden together down in the Hydra (being all lonely and having needs in their wet tank tops) --as well as many other women-- did indeed all die, perhaps their deaths were more connected to their dharma becoming completely balanced and not in the nature of being sacrifices demanded by the island. Their dharma complete, and thus those women's lives here in this world complete, at that exact instant it is therefore immediately "time to go! NOW!" Those women died on the spot, yes, but maybe by a different pathway or phenomenon being at work than that of the island demanding human sacrifices. Same deal for the red shirt males (like Oceanic 815's pilot). By contrast, though, the three definite high-profile human sacrifices explicitly named as being just exactly that --human sacrifices demanded by the island-- have all been pivotally important males: the beautiful Boone (a martyred innocent Christ figure if ever there was one; "Boone" literally means "a beneficial gift or kind assistance freely given"), Locke's father, and Charlie. Maybe something in the broken symmetry of the electromagnetic anomaly event is skewing the metaphysical dharmaworks-wave-particles on the male/female axis such that the discontinuity is literally a matter of life and death for the men and women involved? This notion, in turn, suggests noble servant Ben acting desperately as midwife to the birth of life, healer of the timespace wound, and holder of the bridge between worlds instead of just being a malicious, ratty, and ubersmart little bastard.
What are the other explanations I am overlooking &/or logical contradictions I have naively wandered into? Implications flowing from the articulations of sacrifice in LOST? Why is sacrifice such a big element in so many of the character's development and how have those sacrifices manifested to date? Perhaps most interestingly, what are the sacrifices yet to come and who will be making them, to what effect?
Comments? Guesses?
-
Re: Sacrifice
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 12:19 PM
"...what are the sacrifices yet to come and who will be making them, to what effect?"
Alex's death struck me as being about as sacrificial as is possible, short of being performed on a stone table altar with a stone knife.
Could her death under Keamy's gun have "simply" been the automatic result (analogous consequence) of her dharma having become balanced in that exact instant? Maybe, possibly, but it seems a stretch to me. Though... Ben was looking on and did say some emotionally powerful words just before Keamy pulled the trigger.
By contrast, the doctor from the ship (washed ashore with his corpse's throat sliced open) did not seem sacrificial in the same sense, but rather merely murdered.
Why (that is, toward what ends) are these sacrifices occurring?
sac·ri·fice
Pronunciation:
\ˈsa-krə-ˌfīs, also -fəs or -ˌfīz\
Function:
noun; verb
Etymology:
Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin sacrificium, from sacr-, sacer + facere to make — more at do
Date:
13th century (noun form); 14th century (verb form)
noun forms
1: an act of offering to a deity something precious; especially : the killing of a victim on an altar
2: something offered in sacrifice
3 a: destruction or surrender of something for the sake of something else b: something given up or lost <the sacrifices made by parents>
4: loss <goods sold at a sacrifice>
5: sacrifice hit [a bunt in baseball that allows a runner to advance one base while the batter is put out]
transitive verb forms
1 : to offer as a sacrifice
2 : to suffer loss of, give up, renounce, injure, or destroy especially for an ideal, belief, or end
3 : to sell at a loss
4 : to advance (a base runner) by means of a sacrifice hit
5 : to kill (an animal) as part of a scientific experiment
intransitive verb forms
1 : to make or perform the rites of a sacrifice
2 : to make a sacrifice hit in baseball
[Adapted from source: www.merriam-webster.com/dictio...crifice ] -
-
Re: Sacrifice
Sun, May 11, 2008 - 10:11 PMThe process of sacrifice (sacer + facere) in Roman tradition means to make something sacred by dedicating it to the gods. The thing being sacrificed become the property of the gods in some way, although rules determine *exactly* which part of, say, a sacrificial bull would actually belong to the god in question and which parts would belong to the community. The offering of a whole animal, a holocaust or whole burnt offering, was quite rare exactly because the whole animal became property of the gods. Roman sacrificial ritual had to be carried out precisely, with exactly the right people, words and actions or was invalid and had to be repeated from the beginning.
The Roman concept of "homo sacer," or sacred man, is a man who is dedicated to the gods - he literally becomes the property of the gods. He loses his civil rights and responsibilities, he may be killed by anyone without punishment, but may not be properly sacrificed (as he is already property of the gods). I don't know much about this tradition, but I'm not a specialist in Roman law and my experience with it from the Roman religion side is virtually nill. -
-
Re: Sacrifice
Wed, May 14, 2008 - 11:33 AM“to make something sacred by dedicating it to the gods“
“to kill (an animal, plant, or any other living creature) as part of a scientific experiment”
...or, perhaps, to do both at once?
The sacrifice of both human women and bunny rabbits seems to stem directly from the ongoing crusade to beat the death-in-third-trimester infertility problem.
By contrast, the sacrifices involved at the Hydra station have a different flavor to them, a military flavor. On the smaller LOST island we saw an intriguing derelict laboratory remaining from its DHARMA Initiative days, the Hydra station. The name itself has flavor, referring to a deadly multi-headed mythological beast (more on that following below, with links to illustratons).
The corridors at the Hydra station open to the ocean such that they can be flooded (and in the past, if done correctly as designed, with a high degree of precision I would think), presumably allowing a massive veterinary operating stage (located in the room in which Jack was locked up) to be just below the surface of the water. This means a heavy animal such as a dolphin (like Flipper) or polar bears (polar bears are quite at home in water) could be tranquilized and then easily floated down corridors and onto the operating stage while cradled in a cargo net by a human team.
There is precedent for using dolphins as military operatives. Though the history of such research has been denied, evidence suggests the U.S. military and CIA have experimented with using dolphins to plant magnetic bombs on ships and for other military ends (www.harmlesslion.com/dolphin...ent.htm) and also performed highly hazardous biological weapons research on a Pacific atoll (an atoll which was subsequently incinerated by an H-bomb blast: a microbiologist I knew long ago when I was a youth had personally worked on that project and related this history to me).
Polar bears were also maintained at the Hydra station in Skinnerian behavior-modification cages which seem to test their intelligence. Polar bears are very smart; indeed they are the only arctic predator which will stalk and kill humans. They hide their black noses with white paws to blend in with the snow and avoid being detected until it is too late, as while waiting alongside holes in arctic ice used by seals for breathing. It appears at least two of the clever polar bear subjects of whatever Frankensteinian research was going on at the Hydra station escaped, one Creature slipping off the leash and through both time and space to end up in a Tunisian desert of the distant past. The other Creature to have escaped (the evidence suggests at least one pregnant sow made it to the larger LOST island) and/or its descendants hectored the LOSTies soon after their arrival on the island.
If the DHARMA Initiative was sacrificing animals at the Hydra station as part of the research conducted there, then this research would seem to be targeted toward producing powerful, ruthless, cunningly intelligent animal weapons capable of operating in marine and arctic environments. Why animals and not conventional military weapons? Conventional weapons are usually made of metal ...and machines such as compasses seem to perform differently than intended when subjected to the strange electromagnetic effects of the island.
If the sacrifices of animals such as polar bears at the Hydra station were to produce, literally, a Hydra force, then who or what was this Hydra force being readied to attack or defend?
Hydra: “it had fatally poisonous breath and when one head was severed, grew two in its place; its central head was immortal. Hercules, sent to kill the serpent as the second of his 12 labors, succeeded in slaying it by burning off the eight mortal heads and burying the ninth, immortal head under a huge rock. The term hydra is commonly applied to any complex situation or problem that continually poses compounded difficulties”
encarta.msn.com/encycloped...ology).html
“The Hydra which lived in the swamps near to the ancient city of Lerna in Argolis, was a terrifying monster which like the Nemean lion was the offspring of Echidna (half maiden - half serpent), and Typhon (had 100 heads), other versions think that the Hydra was the offspring of Styx and the Titan Pallas. The Hydra had the body of a serpent and many heads (the number of heads deviates from five up to one hundred there are many versions but generally nine is accepted as standard), of which one could never be harmed by any weapon, and if any of the other heads were severed another would grow in its place (in some versions two would grow). Also the stench from the Hydra's breath was enough to kill man or beast (in other versions it was a deadly venom). When it emerged from the swamp it would attack herds of cattle and local villagers, devouring them with its numerous heads. It totally terrorized the vicinity for many years.”
theochem.chem.rug.nl/resourc...ica.html
Illustrated Hydra goodness:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lernaean_Hydra
www.eaudrey.com/myth/hydra.htm
BTW, how exactly did Dr. Charlotte Staples Lewis know there would be a collar with a Hydra station emblem on the ancient remains of a polar bear unearthed in an archaeological dig site in the Tunisian desert? She went directly to the bones, knew them for polar bear remains, and reached for the collar as if she expected it to be there. The expression on her face upon seeing the Hydra emblem was one of triumph.
Hmmm. Maybe that polar bear did not escape. Maybe part of its sacrifice was to be deliberately sent through the past into the desert. So, how would she know to expect its remains there, though, unless she perhaps was in on it’s sending in the first place?
Indeed, the term "hydra" being "commonly applied to any complex situation or problem that continually poses compounded difficulties" suggests that somebody or somebodies (Jacob vs Abaddon?) is/are attempting to alter timeflows to produce different outcomes, and more than willing to sacrifice animals and people to do so. Alas, each move which is made compounds the complexity of the interwoven skein, hydra-like, perhaps beyond anyone's control.
-
-